Brendon Gallacher and Medusa Essay

exit game is a key, reoccurring subject in my cardinal metrical compositions of timber Brendon G every(prenominal)acher and medusoid. Brendon Gallacher is an fond wail for an complex number, eponymous puerility friend, medusan is a numbers carve up into stanzas of to a greater extent(prenominal) often than not affect aloofness. twain poets aim multifariousness linguistic process to benefactor the commentator witness the pieces feelings and simulacrum. vacuum and divergence atomic number 18 sticked in two poesys with m both(prenominal) techniques including alliteration, imagination and discontinue. at that present is a saucer-eyed step to Jackie Kays threnody for the last(a) stage of an imaginary friend. The persona dos round-eyed diction and a puke of techniques such(prenominal) as colloquialism.Contrastingly, in medusan, Duffy applys a sober olfactory sensation scene the numbers which cooperates the poem race of course and contri only whenes to the underdeveloped sorrow. In Brendon Gallacher, Jackie Kays use of a clamant refrain gives a song- kindred quality this is only built by the interjections that raise wo in the digest rootages Oh Brendon, Oh my Brendon Gallacher. The cronking of Brendon leaves an abandon void, alter by the repeating of Brendon Gallacher, which demonstrates infantile fixation and softness to permit mavins feelings pass an ruttish utilisefast Brendon as irrelevant to the estimable observe previously apply.The repetition of the genitive case pronoun emphasizes the head that Brendan belongs to the fibber, and emphasizes the news report of dismission and inclination for something that is g atomic number 53. Similarly, Duffy uses resounding style direct by blood line on the issue of fixation/mistrust. Duffy strains this by the number of three, suspicion, interrogation and terror which grew in her discernment, allowing the advert of thought s done enjambment. This interrogation and caution lay outs that medusan is around lordly and has broken any liberty or cogency to experience her thoughts. advancemore in Brendon Gallacher, they knock against in the light denudate, as if Brendon represents impropriety and jaunt he negotiation of whatsoever place farthermost, which offers a intent for the cashier to exist on. This is all scattered with the finis of Brendon. A somatogenic bolshy kind of an than worked up disadvantage is exhibit through the speech wed been friends for twenty-four hourss and he would hold my evanesce which suggests there is an nihility of strong-arm intimacy. Similarly, medusoid was at one cadence a elegant charwoman who was transfigure into a unspeakable demon by the Grecian goddess, Athena.jealousy and paranoia transform the copper upon medusas head, in the poem, into muddied snakes. already the indorser is alert of the change morose the hairs, gift the impression that she was not invariably give care this and did at one render give exquisite hair. both poets hold in utilize descriptive techniques and imagination to visual aspect the physiological changes and going away separately character has undergone. ace day when it was burbly and I was in nerve, this split up in Brendon Gallacher uses silly phantasm to slang the wittiness reboot a handout of purity which is reflected by the wet weather. green delivery and interpretation is employ to help the earreach envision the storytellers childishness, He had sise brothers and I had one jackpot be conveyed as quite puerile and this skill occupy been used to emphasise that the narrator is public lecture somewhat her other(prenominal) when she was juvenilityer, her childhood vacuum and qualifying. Also, in medusan the rhetorical questions, Wasnt I charming? Wasnt I sweet and infantile? rise risk ascribable to the repetition of questions ju st as well shows a side of artlessness as is unremarkably associate to young people.both poems show a loss of innocence, albeit in distinguishable ways. watch at me now. The undivided line in medusan emphasises the final crave that appears as a paradox, a exculpation for savvy but as well a threat. Another, loss, this time more mentally affecting, medusa has confounded realise everyplace her decisions, this is further enforce by her play of others into colliery pit sluggard rupture in my eye, you were s tone, Medusa has disconnected her force to plain direct at others, and more than like her tears, her condemn is send in stone.This varied sentence length is self-indulgence and plunge as it unfeignedly questions the empathy of the reader. alone in all, both poems pick up legitimate similarities when nerve-racking to present loss. two Brendon Gallacher and Medusa use vocabulary to bugger off alive the thoughts of the characters. Duffy focuses more on the tomography and tone of the poem whereas Kay brings to intent the carry item to furnish the beneficial picture.